> Matthew if you knew my history and my concerns you would not think that I > was enjoying this. As someone who spent yesterday and today re-writing my > own "Designation" sections for the products I will be releasing this summer, > I am very keenly interested, and not in the slightest bit delighted. > Concerned? Yes. Dismayed? Yes. Happy? Not a bit.
Fair enough. > I think there was a significant discussion of your OGC Declaration. Can you > give us some idea if you intend to continue using the same one. (I do have > a very personal interest in this question as if your OGC declaration is > going to be considered acceptable then I intend on using the same method in > my products.) Given this fracas, yes - if we had used the same system as with Feats, the problems here would never have arisen. Hence, we'll stick to what is safe. Matthew _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
