> First find me one legally trained person who thinks > the phrase "Everything derived from the SRD is OGC" > is, by itself, sufficient to meet the clear > identification to a reasonable person test, then > this > might be a worthwhile discussion to open up. > > Clark has argued that such a phrase is okay as a > safety valve just in case the main part of the OGC > declaration accidentally misses something that > should > be OGC.
Alec is right, IMHO. I have said it is OK as a safety valve. He and I disagree on that. But I certainly agree with him that the "everything derived from the SRD is OGC" is insufficient if that is the only way OGC is identified. Clark ===== http://www.necromancergames.com "3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel" _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
