--- Doug Meerschaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Kletch wrote: > > >Or you just use some other similar, unrelated content, and the 'sabotaged' > OGC > >will eventually die off, the last of its kind. > > > >Anything you reference has to be tracable to the actual content. If you say > in > >your Section 15 that you used "Mike's Big Book of Spells" and "Mike's Big > Book > >of Monsters", but you do not have a single monster, spell, or snippet of > text > >in your work that is traceable to these works, then you are in violation of > the > >license. > > > > > No, you're not. > > You can put anything you want to in your Section 15--so that part of the > license won't bite you. > > As long as you're not "indicating compatabilty or co-adaptability", > you're not in violation of use of the names, either. > > > Heck, you could even get away with it, regardless of what the license > says, by making a work that contains your new OGC and the OGC of "Mike's > Books", and then deriving from that. > > > DM
Yes, you could obviously do the latter. The former would not make you a hero, just annoy your peers and customers. -Mike __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
