> If, to continue Ryan's example, I really want to use > "The OGF Lurker" > from CC:III, and I know that it's all new OGC, I can > send an e-mail to > Clark and ask him directly. > > Clark, being a smart producer, would either ignore > the e-mail, say "no, > use CC:III", or, if he's feeling generous, say > "derive from the file I'm > attaching you," which would be a work by itself, > with "The OGF Lurker", > OGC & PI declarations (and maybe a PI license), and > an updated & trimmed > Section 15 on its OGL. > > If Clark says "no" or doesn't say anything, I have > to use all of > CC:III's section 15--but if I have my message from > Clark, I have a > different distribution to use and can, thus, drop > the superfluous > Section 15s. (Of course, it'd take quite a bit to > get Clark to do this > for me.)
Actually, I'd say "sure, go ahead" and I'd email you the file for your use, asking only that you drop a credit in the product along the lines of "Lurker can be found in CC3 by SSS". That's what we've always done before. Clark ===== http://www.necromancergames.com "3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel" _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
