> Now here, as I understand it, is the crux of Alec's > argument. If the > material is non-OGC, the OGL does not apply to it. > Therefore, the > designation of PI has no meaning within non-OGC, > only within OGC.
He and I have always agreed on this. In fact, I proposed it long ago. > And > therefore, PI is NOT non-OGC; Corrrect. PI is a subset of OGC. If the content isnt mixed with OGC, there is no need to designate it as PI. Clark ===== http://www.necromancergames.com "3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel" _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
