From: Clark Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Nope. A semantic slip, but an important one. The > licence specifically > states that PI is >not< OGC.Actually, PI is stuff that would be OGC because it falls within a section designated as OGC, but because you designate it as PI it is not OGC. You can also designate stuff that is not in OGC as PI.
Much better!
Yes. Exactly. My chief concern is the "no sub-license" clause of the OGL that states that OGC cannot have restrictions placed on it by subsidiary licences. This is *not* the case with PI - you can have sub-licenses on it to your heart's content.So as I said in my last post, perhaps "subset" is not the best way to put it. My bad.
Faust
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
