--- Jeff Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand (and as I have said, I agree) that everything derived from the > SRD is insufficient by itself to serve as identification. But, since PI can > be part of OGC then the statement, "The entire text of this book is OGC. > However, all information derived from source X is PI and may not be reused > without permission etc." does declare what is OGC (which I believe was Mike > Kletch's complaint). If I then list all of the sections I can think of that > are from source X, is the statement, "all information derived from source X > is PI and may not be reused etc." going to serve in the same catch all > capacity? In fact, if source X is a PD source I could include it on my > website for anyone's perusal.
I made a comment a couple days ago where I said the products needed to be self contained, and Clark didn't understand what I meant. I now have an example to use to explain it. I guess my concern was more along the lines of, if you use this "source X" type of reference for either PI or non-OGC material, you have to state what those "source X" derivatives are. You cannot simply leave it for a user to find your source and 'figure out' what you meant. You have to include as much information as necessary so that anybody can figure out what the "source X" materials are using only your product. -Mike __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
