Hi René and thanks for the info.

I had missed the fact that one needed to manually synch CMakelists.txt with 
oorexx.spec.in <http://oorexx.spec.in/> (I did not even realize there was a 
link) and broke the installer for CentOS when adding some samples missing 
CMakeLists.txt. Enrico explained the connection and I could correct it. I was 
in the middle of checking/sorting these two files for the remaining 
missing/superfluous files in /samples when Erichs change came in. I will go 
ahead and make the necessary changes later this week, I did not have time to 
submit it.

Regarding the „switch“ I think it is a sub-optimal solution to a problem of a 
few causing problems for the many. The optimal solution would be a relocatable 
ooRexx installation, as we have it now for macOS.

Regarding checking Jenkins an automated mail service would be beneficial.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se



> Am 06.04.2020 um 16:56 schrieb René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl>:
> 
> Just last week I generated a .deb for AARCH64 for someone, and it all ran 
> fine - checked it first on a Raspi with Ubuntu on it. It is true that Erich 
> conferred with me about rolling it back; the check in was done in haste when 
> Mark was busy with firefighting (literally! Australia). Its intention was to 
> have update-alternatives working correctly for ooRexx. It should go back in 
> when someone gets it to work.
> 
> I would politely ask everyone to check Jenkins when a change is made. This 
> goes for myself too. P.O. is doing very good work with that. I wonder if we 
> need to coordinate more on that, so we can at least check our own platforms 
> when significant change is made.
> 
> René.
> 
>> On 6 Apr 2020, at 16:47, P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se 
>> <mailto:oor...@jonases.se>> wrote:
>> 
>> OK thanks for the info. 
>> 
>> Does this mean that the „switch“ stuff (rexx-oorexx) is gone?
>> 
>> Does this also mean that oorexx.spec.in <http://oorexx.spec.in/> is now 
>> generated by CMake (or Cpack)?
>> 
>> Are there other files that are affected?
>> 
>> Unfortunately there seems to be other problems with the installer on the 
>> Unix platform, see my other mail. Not sure if this was the reason?
>> 
>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>> P.O. Jonsson
>> oor...@jonases.se <mailto:oor...@jonases.se>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 06.04.2020 um 16:35 schrieb Erich Steinböck <erich.steinbo...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:erich.steinbo...@gmail.com>>:
>>> 
>>> Hi P.O.
>>> this removes the CMake changes by Mark Hessling which were committed by 
>>> René.
>>> They had been causing a bunch of issues, where the code duplication you've 
>>> seen with oorexx.spec.in <http://oorexx.spec.in/> is one of them.
>>> 
>>> René confirmed that the best option was to roll them back.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to