On 26.07.2020 14:11, Rick McGuire wrote: > The only reservation I have is that new APIs can get introduced in minor > releases as well as major > releases. As such, wouldn't it be better if "5.0" were used? A library for a > 5.1 release might > contain APIs that a 5.0 release does not. The old convention was probably an > error.
It seems that you foresee situations with ooRexx that warrant at least ORX_MINOR to be used, even worse, you view the old convention to be in error! In that case it would not make sense to simplify the so version number for ooRexx 5.0 to only use ORX_MAJOR then and the question is whether it makes sense to change the current setting of ORX_VERSION at all then! :) ---rony _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
