Rick, hoping that electricity and everything else has been restored by now, 
hence the question
whether you have had time already to look at the patch 
<https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/_discuss/thread/3374511d18/a4d6/attachment/patch-new-newfile-from-encoded.txt>
from <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1716/>?

---rony


On 07.08.2020 13:23, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> Just updated <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1716/> with a new patch 
> (adds support in
> LanguageParser::createProgram(), simplifies code a little bit more) and test 
> files going with it.
>
> ---rony
>
>
> On 07.08.2020 12:21, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> On 07.08.2020 00:02, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>> Been without power here since Tuesday and probably won’t have power until 
>>> the weekend, so I
>>> won’t be able to review anything.
>>
>> Wow, sorry to hear that! All the best!
>>
>> ---
>>
>> In the process of updating the patch (missed createProgram(), simplifying 
>> code a little bit more).
>>
>> ---rony
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:51 PM Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
>>> <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Please review the fixes.
>>>
>>>     If there are no objections I will apply the patch of #1716 (it also 
>>> includes the patch for
>>>     bug #1715) together with test units to test for them.
>>>
>>>     ---rony
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 06.08.2020 19:47, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     The bug report in <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1716/>
>>>>     <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1716/> includes a patch that 
>>>> fixes this.
>>>>
>>>>     ---rony
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On 05.08.2020 15:16, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     Having received error reports from users of BSF4ooRexx like
>>>>>
>>>>>              2 *-* /**/@
>>>>>         Error 13 running 
>>>>> rexx_invoked_via_[fxml_01.fxml]_at_2020_08_05T12_33_24_17Z.rex line 2:  
>>>>> Invalid character in program.
>>>>>         Error 13.1:  Incorrect character in program "@" ('40'X).
>>>>>
>>>>>     and looking up the execution paths in those cases, it turns out that 
>>>>> the ooRexx .routine
>>>>>     class gets used to create the executable in those cases with a string 
>>>>> array representing
>>>>>     the compiled and encoded Rexx program.
>>>>>
>>>>>     So the "new" method of the .routine class gets the compiled and 
>>>>> encoded source supplied as
>>>>>     an array of strings, e.g.:
>>>>>
>>>>>         #!/usr/bin/env rexx
>>>>>         /**/@REXX@
>>>>>         
>>>>> LyoqL0BSRVhYAAAAAAAAAGcrKgAgAAAAVOwAAAAAAABwEgAAVPq7VhgAAAACAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>>>>         
>>>>> AAAAAAAAgB68ViAAAAACAAAAKAAAAAAAAABwAAAAOAAAAAAAAADkSrxWOAAAAAIAAAAFAACA
>>>>>         ... cut ...
>>>>>
>>>>>     Supplying the compiled and encoded data as a single string to the 
>>>>> .routine class does not
>>>>>     work as this issues the error "13.1, Invalid character in program" 
>>>>> caused by the presence
>>>>>     of a LF ('0A'x) character, here a rexxtry example:
>>>>>
>>>>>         infile=.stream~new("nutshell_01.rex-compiled")~~open("read")
>>>>>           ........................................... rexxtry.rex on 
>>>>> WindowsNT
>>>>>         pgm=infile~charin(infile~chars)
>>>>>           ........................................... rexxtry.rex on 
>>>>> WindowsNT
>>>>>         infile~close
>>>>>           ........................................... rexxtry.rex on 
>>>>> WindowsNT
>>>>>         r1=.routine~new("aha",pgm)
>>>>>           Oooops ! ... try again.     Invalid character in program.
>>>>>                                       Incorrect character in program "
>>>>>         " ('0A'X).
>>>>>           rc = 13.1 ................................. rexxtry.rex on 
>>>>> WindowsNT
>>>>>
>>>>>     As a compiled and encoded form of a Rexx program always has the 
>>>>> string "/**/@REXX@" as the
>>>>>     value for its second line it would be possible to determine that the 
>>>>> String array comes
>>>>>     from a compiled and encoded Rexx program. Rather than creating an 
>>>>> error in this case, the
>>>>>     routine object could get created successfully from the String array 
>>>>> representing a
>>>>>     compiled and encoded Rexx program.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Are there any objections to try to enhance the "new" method of the 
>>>>> .routine (and the
>>>>>     .method) class such that the string array can represent a compiled 
>>>>> and encoded Rexx program?
>>>>>
>>>>>     ---rony
>>>>>

_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to