Rick, hoping that electricity and everything else has been restored by now, hence the question whether you have had time already to look at the patch <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/_discuss/thread/3374511d18/a4d6/attachment/patch-new-newfile-from-encoded.txt> from <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1716/>?
---rony On 07.08.2020 13:23, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > > Just updated <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1716/> with a new patch > (adds support in > LanguageParser::createProgram(), simplifies code a little bit more) and test > files going with it. > > ---rony > > > On 07.08.2020 12:21, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> On 07.08.2020 00:02, Rick McGuire wrote: >>> Been without power here since Tuesday and probably won’t have power until >>> the weekend, so I >>> won’t be able to review anything. >> >> Wow, sorry to hear that! All the best! >> >> --- >> >> In the process of updating the patch (missed createProgram(), simplifying >> code a little bit more). >> >> ---rony >> >> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:51 PM Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at >>> <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote: >>> >>> Please review the fixes. >>> >>> If there are no objections I will apply the patch of #1716 (it also >>> includes the patch for >>> bug #1715) together with test units to test for them. >>> >>> ---rony >>> >>> >>> On 06.08.2020 19:47, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >>>> >>>> The bug report in <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1716/> >>>> <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1716/> includes a patch that >>>> fixes this. >>>> >>>> ---rony >>>> >>>> >>>> On 05.08.2020 15:16, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Having received error reports from users of BSF4ooRexx like >>>>> >>>>> 2 *-* /**/@ >>>>> Error 13 running >>>>> rexx_invoked_via_[fxml_01.fxml]_at_2020_08_05T12_33_24_17Z.rex line 2: >>>>> Invalid character in program. >>>>> Error 13.1: Incorrect character in program "@" ('40'X). >>>>> >>>>> and looking up the execution paths in those cases, it turns out that >>>>> the ooRexx .routine >>>>> class gets used to create the executable in those cases with a string >>>>> array representing >>>>> the compiled and encoded Rexx program. >>>>> >>>>> So the "new" method of the .routine class gets the compiled and >>>>> encoded source supplied as >>>>> an array of strings, e.g.: >>>>> >>>>> #!/usr/bin/env rexx >>>>> /**/@REXX@ >>>>> >>>>> LyoqL0BSRVhYAAAAAAAAAGcrKgAgAAAAVOwAAAAAAABwEgAAVPq7VhgAAAACAAAAAAAAAAAA >>>>> >>>>> AAAAAAAAgB68ViAAAAACAAAAKAAAAAAAAABwAAAAOAAAAAAAAADkSrxWOAAAAAIAAAAFAACA >>>>> ... cut ... >>>>> >>>>> Supplying the compiled and encoded data as a single string to the >>>>> .routine class does not >>>>> work as this issues the error "13.1, Invalid character in program" >>>>> caused by the presence >>>>> of a LF ('0A'x) character, here a rexxtry example: >>>>> >>>>> infile=.stream~new("nutshell_01.rex-compiled")~~open("read") >>>>> ........................................... rexxtry.rex on >>>>> WindowsNT >>>>> pgm=infile~charin(infile~chars) >>>>> ........................................... rexxtry.rex on >>>>> WindowsNT >>>>> infile~close >>>>> ........................................... rexxtry.rex on >>>>> WindowsNT >>>>> r1=.routine~new("aha",pgm) >>>>> Oooops ! ... try again. Invalid character in program. >>>>> Incorrect character in program " >>>>> " ('0A'X). >>>>> rc = 13.1 ................................. rexxtry.rex on >>>>> WindowsNT >>>>> >>>>> As a compiled and encoded form of a Rexx program always has the >>>>> string "/**/@REXX@" as the >>>>> value for its second line it would be possible to determine that the >>>>> String array comes >>>>> from a compiled and encoded Rexx program. Rather than creating an >>>>> error in this case, the >>>>> routine object could get created successfully from the String array >>>>> representing a >>>>> compiled and encoded Rexx program. >>>>> >>>>> Are there any objections to try to enhance the "new" method of the >>>>> .routine (and the >>>>> .method) class such that the string array can represent a compiled >>>>> and encoded Rexx program? >>>>> >>>>> ---rony >>>>>
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel