On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 8:21 AM rvjan...@xs4all.nl <rvjan...@xs4all.nl>
wrote:

> Hi Walter,
>
> Yes, well, it could be a typo. I am worried about all other
> implementations, including NetRexx and z/OS TSO, z/VM, Regina, brexx, etc,
> being wrong if this is the right way. It certainly fails the (however
> subjective) principle of least astonishment, and I also get the feeling the
> ‘numeric digits’ statement is not necessarily meant for the next instance
> of ‘numeric digits’. Changing the error message would go a long way: ‘with
> numeric digits set to X, Y is not a valid positive whole number.’
>

The mainframe versions all behave the same way. I have had this
conversation several times since 1982, almost always from a tester playing
with setting digits to 1.



>
> I’ll put it on the list for the ARB. Who wants to be on the ARB? We have
> an obligation to run an Architecture Review Board, as discussed during the
> symposium. I am looking for volunteers. I suggest at least Erich and Rick
> be on it. I suggest we do not convene more than once a quarter.
>
> René.
>
> On 9 Nov 2020, at 13:59, WalterPachl via Oorexx-devel <
> oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Who on earth (except "us nasty testers") would ever issue ND 1????
>
> I am much more concerned about the performance disaster I reported 2 or 3
> weeks ago :-(
>
> Greetings
>
> WALTER
>
> "Rony G. Flatscher" <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at> hat am 9. November 2020 um
> 11:31 geschrieben:
>
>
> On 09.11.2020 10:35, Erich Steinböck wrote:
>
> This one stunned me!
>
> ~~~
> numeric digits 1
> numeric digits 18
> -- Error 26.5:  DIGITS value must be a positive whole number; found "18".
> ~~~
>
>
> Maybe enhancing the error message to indicate the current setting of
> numeric digits which makes "18"
> not a positive whole number would explain to the programmer why the error
> occurs. Something like
> "Error 26.5:  DIGITS value must be a positive whole number; found "18"
> (numeric digits is currently
> set to 1 digit)."
>
> ---rony
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to