> 2) it appears - I have been told - that CRX (of which I do > not have a running version), does evaluate the numeric > argument under the current settings and comes up (for 18) > with 2E+1, so 2. While just as astonishing (well, maybe a bit > more), this is even more PLE than ooRexx.
That would be 20, not 2. So it would seem that that CRX is the most correct .. even the error message uses the current NUMERIC DIGITS. Arguable (although I don't think ANSI defined how error messages are constructed -- but maybe it did?). Anyway, hats off to the late Brian Marks! Mike _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
