On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 17:32 +0200, Marta Rybczynska via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > I'm not a copyright lawyer, but from what I understand public domain > is not a licence. For a discussion > see https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Decisions/Dealing_with_Publ > ic_Domain_within_SPDX_Files > > The next version of xz will be 0BSD so the statement will change too.
I did check into this a bit. We do have a "placeholder" license file in our common-licenses directory so PD is accepted in our license fields but there is no SPDX PD license identifier for the reasons linked to above, each wording is different. PD means different things in different locations too. Switching to 0BSD probably makes things easier! For now, mentioning PD in the LICENSE field would match other recipes. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#201180): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/201180 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105937026/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
