David Brownell wrote: > --- On Fri, 11/12/10, Freddie Chopin <freddie_cho...@op.pl> wrote: > > it's hard to imagine a chip that has no srst, > > As for boards or JTAG adapters without nSRST, > no imagination is required; I have production > boards of both flavors.
Very true, but I think part of the current confusion is due to combination of reset properties of CPU cores and reset properties of boards and interfaces into the same variable, which I think we must avoid going forward. > > that option can be removed > > Shouldn't be, though; that'd be very unwise. I think the point is that we should give openocd the information it needs so that it can know when srst is really usable, and not. I completely agree with the model Freddie outlined, of having capabilities for each component involved, and openocd finding the cross-section of those capabilities. I think we should try to take small steps in that direction. Having a specific soft-reset config might be a good first step. //Peter _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
