Hi AndersBj,

Reviewed the patch.
Ack.

/Neel.

On Tuesday 20 May 2014 03:05 PM, Anders Bjornerstedt wrote:
> Summary: imm: Add upgrade flag for OpenSAF4.5 in opensafImmNostdFlags [#842]
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 842
> Peer Reviewer(s): Neel; Zoran
> Pull request to:
> Affected branch(es): default(4.5)
> Development branch:
>
> --------------------------------
> Impacted area       Impact y/n
> --------------------------------
>   Docs                    n
>   Build system            n
>   RPM/packaging           n
>   Configuration files     n
>   Startup scripts         n
>   SAF services            n
>   OpenSAF services        y
>   Core libraries          n
>   Samples                 n
>   Tests                   n
>   Other                   n
>
>
> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> changeset e8d651611b7260f371e50f3aa19e717fe23c415b
> Author:       Anders Bjornerstedt <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 11:07:54 +0200
>
>       imm: Add upgrade flag for OpenSAF4.5 in opensafImmNostdFlags [#842]
>
>       New message types and new server states have been added to the immsv in
>       OpenSAF 4.5. During upgrades from older OpenSAF releases to the OpenSAF 
> 4.5
>       release, usage of the new message types and new states would cause 
> problems
>       for the mixed version cluster.
>
>       The OpensAF IMM uses the opensafImmNostdFlags in the imm service object:
>       'opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService' for managing such 
> transient and
>       special functionality. This changeset allocates bit 5 of the bitvector 
> for
>       this purpose. See osaf/services/saf/immsv/README for details.
>
> This patch only adds support for the flag and auto enablement of the flag at
> cluster restart. Actual usage of the new flag (bit 5) will be added as a part
> for each 4.5 ticket that needs upgade protection.
>
>
> Complete diffstat:
> ------------------
>   osaf/libs/common/immsv/include/immsv_api.h |   1 +
>   osaf/services/saf/immsv/README             |  46 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmModel.cc  |  31 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmModel.hh  |   1 +
>   osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/immnd_init.h |   1 +
>   5 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>
> Testing Commands:
> -----------------
> After cluster start check the value of the opensafImmNostdFlags RTA in
> the object: 'opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService'.
>
>      immlist opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService
>
>
> Testing, Expected Results:
> --------------------------
>
> After cluster start the opensafImmNostdFlags of the object:
> 'opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService' should have bits 2, 3 and 5
> turned on. That would be the bits controlling:
>
> Bit 2 controls OpenSAF4.1 protocols allowed or not.
> Bit 3 controls OpenSAF4.3 protocols allowed or not.
> Bit 5 controls OpenSAF4.5 protocols allowed or not.
>
> This ticket only tracks the addition of support for the 4.5 protocol bit.
> Actually testing the usage/sensitivity to the bit will be part of each
> relevant 4.5 enhancement ticket.
> I will re-open relevant tickets for this accordingly.
>
>
> Conditions of Submission:
> -------------------------
> Ack from Neel.
>
>
> Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
> -------------------------------------------
> mips        n          n
> mips64      n          n
> x86         n          n
> x86_64      n          n
> powerpc     n          n
> powerpc64   n          n
>
>
> Reviewer Checklist:
> -------------------
> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
>
>
> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
>
> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
>      that need proper data filled in.
>
> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
>
> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
>
> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
>
> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
>
> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
>
> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
>      (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
>
> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
>      Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
>
> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
>
> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
>      like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
>
> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
>      cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
>
> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
>      too much content into a single commit.
>
> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
>
> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
>      Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
>
> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
>      commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
>
> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
>      of what has changed between each re-send.
>
> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
>      comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
>
> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
>
> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
>      the threaded patch review.
>
> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
>      for in-service upgradability test.
>
> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
>      do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to