Summary: mds: Correct timing issues in mdstest [#2798]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2798
Peer Reviewer(s):Hans, Anders
Pull request to: Hans, Anders
Affected branch(es): develop, release
Development branch: ticket-2798
Base revision: dac6b5bf582e581252f21d32b470f91d5629b867
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/xhoalee/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   y
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

revision 991afa77507212f681620782b35e5e7baa1b449b
Author: Hoa Le <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:45:57 +0700

mds: Correct timing issues in mdstest [#2798]

In some bad thread scheduling situations, the API service request
on the testing thread may be executed before the corresponding
event being received on the MDS thread. This will lead to
unexpected behavior of the service request and cause the failure
of this test case.

This patch adds a sleep period for mdstest to wait for the expected
event being received on MDS thread before invoking the testing
service request.



Complete diffstat:
------------------
 src/mds/apitest/mdstipc_api.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
mdstest 4 10
mdstest 4 12
mdstest 5 1
mdstest 5 9
mdstest 10 1
mdstest 10 2
mdstest 14 5
mdstest 14 6


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
No failure appears.



Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
ACK from reviewer.


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to