Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Frankly, the effort to create a new case (fast track or otherwise) is > so small, that I'd just spin off the /usr/lib/shell part into a > separate fast track. If you would like a sponsor for it, write up a > quick draft -- you can probably just extract the relevant text from > this case -- and I'll be happy to sponsor it for you. (Really, I'm > not trying to make more work for you, but simply make it easier to > review/discuss, and decrease overall contention.) > > As far as populating /usr/lib/shell with other unrelated functionality > goes: if you have functionality to populate there that is not related > to the ksh93 update portions of this case, then I *strongly* request > you submit that as a separate case. I feel strongly enough about > that, that I'll probably hit the derail button if you try to squeeze > that into this case. > > Please also note, I'm merely requesting a separation of review > components. You can deliver the bits together, or separately, > according to whatever arrangements you and the CTeam make. > > -- Garrett
I've not heard from any other ARC members that they feel strongly about this. That doesn't mean they don't; we often just let the poster of the initial request continue to discuss. However, this is starting to sound like a lone voice here. Do other ARC members believe this is significant and we should continue discussing this? (I actually agree with Garrett's suggestion. However, Roland seemed to not accept this *suggestion*, so I think we should just drop it.) - jek3
