Stefan Teleman wrote: > > > Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >> Your confusing "build dependencies" with "delivery". > > No, i am not. Please read my explanation again. I believe it was pretty > clear the first time around.
It is *NOT* clear because I came to the same conclusion as Garrett. I've already asked for this case to be put in 'waiting need spec' so that I can see the GCC4 case and see the bigger picture. This is required only because this case is introducing a gcc4 subdir. -- Darren J Moffat
