Garrett D'Amore wrote: > On 10/24/08 09:16, Stefan Teleman wrote: >> >> Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> >>> Your confusing "build dependencies" with "delivery". >> No, i am not. Please read my explanation again. I believe it was >> pretty clear the first time around. > > Not to me it wasn't. The statement you made was that you were > delivering binutils *first*, because of the fact that in order to build > gcc with --configure, you needed to supply paths to gas, etc. > > What I said is, that problem is a build dependency problem. You could > deliver the final bits together (which IMO is the right thing to do if > this case is primarily being done for benefit of gcc.)
No, i cannot. Since you seem convinced of the opposite, please explain to PSARC exactly how is GCC going to find its assembler executable, at run-time, after pkgadd, when the path to the assembler executable was hardcoded at build time to: /builds2/steleman/ws/sfwnv-gcc4/proto/root_i386/usr/gcc4/bin/gas and this path will not exist on any Solaris distro that I can speak of. --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman Sun Microsystems, Inc. Stefan.Teleman at Sun.COM
