Brandorr wrote:
> While working on this could people consider the conflicting messages
> I've heard... "ARC early and often" and "Don't ARC until it's
> completely fleshed out at the CG level."
>
I think ARC early and often is the right thing to do for projects that
have their core specs worked out. Its supposed to be done early enough
though, that there is still time for the specs (and implementation!) to
change in response to ARC feedback.
OTOH, if all you have is an *idea*, then it is too soon to ARC. ARC
wants to look at fairly complete proposals. (Note that specification
complete does *not* equal implementation complete.) ARC doesn't design
your project for you, but they might request that your project design be
changed.
-- Garrett
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> On Nov 9, 2007 6:37 PM, John Plocher <John.Plocher at sun.com> wrote:
>
>> I (for one) would love it if the subject-matter experts took an active
>> hand in doing this sort of work. I'd much rather have "20 howtos"
>> than "20 questions"!
>>
>> -John
>>
>>
>> Darren Reed wrote:
>>
>>> In order to see better delivery of projects to PSARC, do we
>>> simply need to transform the BP documents into HOW-TOs?
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> opensolaris-arc mailing list
>> opensolaris-arc at opensolaris.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
