> > I have another suggestion. Seeing that /etc/project already uses > > user.<name> and group.<name>, why not svc.<name>, where <name> is > > derived from the service FMRI? That seems sufficient to achieve our real
> Doubleplus good. ;-) Gary..
> > I have another suggestion. Seeing that /etc/project already uses > > user.<name> and group.<name>, why not svc.<name>, where <name> is > > derived from the service FMRI? That seems sufficient to achieve our real
> Doubleplus good. ;-) Gary..