Darren,

  I agree with Alan's proposal that the existing system extended 
attributes be expanded
to include "offline" or whatever the appropriate tag could be. This 
would require a change
to SAM-QFS to support Solaris extended attributes in at least the case 
of that flag (a SAM-QFS
project/case, I'd guess) and modifying the interfaces introduced in 
PSARC/2007/315 to include
the newly defined flag.
  This case appears to be asking to use existing interfaces of SAM-QFS 
to cause the
Solaris provided samba to detect a condition that is causing the 
described customer
problem, and mitigate it. The resultant FILE_ATTRIBUTE_OFFLINE within the
SMB_QUERY_FILE_BASIC_INFO appears to be standard (at least in the SNIA
document).
  I would think that advise to the PAC about modifying SAM-QFS to at 
least support
an system extended attribute for offline, and for some unknown group to 
add that to
the existing system extended attributes would be an appropriate response.
  In the mean time, I would think this case could be approved with a TCR 
to modify
the version of Samba shipped by Sun when the architecturally appropriate 
interfaces
(those using the existing infrastructure described in PSARC/2007/315) 
exist in Sun
current and future HSM products.
  I could help add this to the general opinion, or add it as a minority 
opinion.
==
Rick

  On 07/ 9/09 04:33 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Alan.M.Wright wrote:
>> Providing this as a temporary solution to relieve a customer problem
>> is excellent.  My disagreement is that it should be committed as a
>> long term solution for offline support when we already have a defined
>> system attribute mechanism that could be used to solve the problem
>> via libc.
>
> Given the above I'm derailing this case for the purpose of writing an 
> opinion with Advice to fund the above mentioned project and to point 
> out the issue of adding Solaris/Sun functionality to Samba with no 
> planned match for the in kernel CIFS server.
>
> PSARC members please are you willing to vote based on the above our 
> would you like to see draft opinion text first.   I've marked the case 
> as "waiting need vote" for now.
>
> Note that this is *derail* not *deny* (though depending on the vote it 
> could be but I doubt it).

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Rick Matthews                           email: Rick.Matthews at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc.                  phone:+1(651) 554-1518
1270 Eagan Industrial Road              phone(internal): 54418
Suite 160                               fax:  +1(651) 554-1540
Eagan, MN 55121-1231 USA                main: +1(651) 554-1500          
---------------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to