John Forte wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> In principle this looks good, and I'm almost ready to +1 it, but I >> have a few questions first: >> >> 1) I don't know enough about the FC protocol... will forcing target >> ports to reinitialize have any negative implications for the >> initiators? I'd like to understand the ramifications of any side >> effects. > The initiators will get a RSCN (Remote State Change Notification) from > the FC switch, which will generally cause them to rediscover for any > changes to the fabric, which is generally the desired behavior from > the administrator issuing this command. >> >> 2) Are any additional privileges required for this operation? What >> are the privileges needed to perform this action? > I believe sys_devices is required. Reed? Yes, that's correct.
Thanks, -Reed >> >> 3) Will the luxadm version of the command be Obsoleted at some point? > Yes, that was the plan as noted in the PSARC 2004/291. Forcelip > functionality was one of the last (perhaps the last) reason to keep > luxadm around. > > - John
