I'm not sure if members of other ARCs (LSARC) can derail PSARC cases.
If so, then no problem here. If not, please take this message as
indicating that I am derailing this case (in other words, if John can't
derail it, then I can.)
As one of the more vociferous detractors for this case, it probably
would be a good idea to CC me on the conversation between Stefan and Steve.
-- Garrett
John Plocher wrote:
> John Plocher wrote on the 26th of September:
>> I'm really disappointed that the compiler team hasn't jumped in to this
>> discussion. Have they been contacted and invited?
>
> I just got the following from Steve Clamage, one of the lead engineers
> on the compiler team:
>
>> I was only today made aware of this PSARC case, and I would like to
>> derail the fast-track if it is not too late. I knew the topic was
>> being discussed, and contributed negative comments to those who
>> mentioned it to me. In short, I think the proposal is
>> counter-productive,
>> makes false statements of fact, and will not (and cannot) have the
>> good effects it claims.
>
> Please consider this fasttrack case derailed. The next step is for
> Stefan
> and Steve to get together [somewhere not on the PSARC aliases] and
> discuss
> these issues, and to then come back with their resolutions and/or an
> updated
> proposal.
>
> -John
>
>
