Martina Tomisova wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > >> That can't be right, can it? > It seems it can. I'm integrating the package into the Nevada so as I'm > informed it has nothing to do with IPS team and Indiana. And Nevada SFW > gatekeepers recommended me to use the class action script.
However the ARC members are advising you to do something different not just because of IPS (in fact not because of IPS at all!) but because I think that creating a package purely to run a class action script when there is a neater and simpler solution of integrating the line into ON. I'd like to hear from other ARC members on this but I feel that introducing a root package just for updating exec_attr is wasteful, even though it does mean putbacks to two consolidations. -- Darren J Moffat
