Michael Kearney wrote: > I've updated the IAM file to reflect fast track rather than self > review. Sorry, my bad.
Please also change it to a PSARC rather than LSARC case, I believe the expertise in this area lies in PSARC and previous cases for IPMI have been reviewed there. > Best Regards, > Michael > > Darren J Moffat wrote: >> This is clearly a platform level tool and as such is probably more >> appropriate for review in PSARC. >> >> It is also not self review in my opinion since I don't see how >> interaction with the existing ipmitool is covered. Nor do I see any >> way that the two daemons are started - I'd expect SMF services. >> >> Please address the above issues and move the case to be reviewed in >> PSARC.
