Mike Oliver ??:
> Shi-Ying Irene Huang wrote:
>> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.66 04/17/08 SMI
>> This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems
>> 1. Introduction
>>     1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
>>      usbutils for OpenSolaris
>>     1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
>>      Author:  Henry Zhang
>>     1.3  Date of This Document:
>>     11 August, 2008
>> 4. Technical Description
>> 1. Introduction
>>
>>   1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
>>
>>        usbutils 0.73
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> 2.2. Risks and Assumptions:
>>     1. Usbutil uses libusb on Solaris, currently libusb can only wrok 
>> with
>>        the usb devices that support the Ugen driver, so this tool will 
>> only
>>        display all USB devices with Ugen. We will add a note into the 
>> manpage.
> 
> libusb on Solaris works for both ugen and Sun Ray USB devices.
> (libusb on Solaris is implemented as a wrapper that selects and uses
> an appropriate lower-level plug-in.  Plug-ins exist for ugen and Sun
> Ray.  See PSARC 2003/721.)
> 
> Will the tool(s) introduced by this case work on Sun Ray?  I know
> 'lsusb' used to work on Sun Ray as of about a year ago.
If libusb can support SunRay,then I'd think lsusb will also..

> 
>  >   4.5. Interfaces:
>  >
>  >      Imported Interfaces
>  >      Interface             Stability    Comments
>  >      -------------------     -----------  
> -----------------------------------
>  >
>  >      libusb                Volatile     PSARC/2003/721
> 
> The SAC "Interface Taxonomy" Best Practice document
> <http://sac.eng/cgi-bin/bp.cgi?NAME=interface_taxonomy.bp> says:
> 
>   Sun products should consider Volatile interfaces as equivalent to
>   Consolidation Private. A contract is required for use of these
>   interfaces outside of the supplying consolidation.
> 
> As far as I can tell libusb is in ON and this case's deliverables will
> be in the JDS consolidation.  If that's correct then you'll need to
> execute a contract with the group that owns libusb.
> 
> How does this case relate to PSARC 2008/018, which declares libusb to
> be Obsolete and proposes to deliver OpenUSB as its replacement?

I am filling in the contract, I know there is OpenUSB, but not sure if 
and when they will obsolete libusb, I will confirm with them on this now...
> 
> Mike.

Reply via email to