Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> locate is a clear security risk. For familiarity locate command should 
> be an alias to slocate executable.

My understanding was that locate was perfectly secure providing it was 
not installed setuid/setgid and that the datebase it looks at was not 
generated by other user.

What do most Linux distributions that ship GNU findutils and slocate do?

The slocate case didn't provide an updatedb.conf file because this case 
was likely to deliver one.

glocate would be wrong according to the rules because there is no 
clashing /usr/bin/locate at this time.

-- 
Darren J Moffat

Reply via email to