Bart Smaalders wrote: > Joseph Kowalski wrote: > > Now you feel that PSARC should be involved before a preview are done, so > that expectations are not raised/dashed w/o appropriate review? In a perfect world, YES. Its not a requirement, just part of the history of successful projects. Come early, come often.
Note, I never said that PSARC should "deny" a prototype. Its all about communication. Do you feel that Indiana has a good job of communication with the remainder of Sun and the OpenSolaris communities? > Should > you also vet our discussions on opensolaris aliases so those > would not set any expectations that would not meet w/ PSARC approval? Yep, its all about communication. (vet is a rather strong word) > Indiana is a prototype. Things are going to change. It's going to be > different. > > Innovation requires experimentation. Experimentation implies both > positive and > negative outcomes; we aim to learn from our mistakes and share the > experience > with the world during development. This means that we _will_ try > something that > doesn't make it into the finished product for one reason or another. > That's ok. > > It's a prototype. Could you please point me at the outward facing descriptions from Indiana which set the customer expectations so that we can be comfortable that its just a prototype? - thanks, - jek3
