David.Comay at sun.com wrote: > And again, there have been some discussions already at the ARC. See > for example > > /shared/sac/PSARC/Minutes/2007/20070530.2007.039.* > /shared/sac/PSARC/Minutes/2007/20070905.2007.492.* Not to be a grouch, but I recall these discussion as having many resolved issues. "We haven't decided on <mumble>". That's fine. That's even good.
However, it seems that Indiana did decide on something, as witnessed by shipping something. Sure, the fine print lets the choice be changed, but at the cost of disappointing somebody. Maybe its just too long since we had an "inception" review. Its been around 6 months. It seems like we should of had one just after the first of the year. However, remember that these were all "umbrella cases". What I personally would like to see would be inception cases for the more interesting and controversial projects. Some of what Indiana is about just deciding which interfaces to use - a great place for arguments, but we all know the issues. There are other places where Indiana seems to be inventing completely new things - installation and packaging come to mind. These are the cases I'd hope could find their way into review rather soon. Of course, this is just my wish. The only thing I might add, is that should it come to the deadline for review, and becomes a firedrill, expect us to say "we told you so". :-) - jek3
