George Vasick wrote: > Darren J Moffat wrote: >> So will all possible code that the GNU backend can build also be able >> to be built with the Studio backend ? > > "all possible" is a pretty big claim. The answer is a qualified yes. We > designed the product to be 100% compatible. There is always a chance > somebody will find a bug. > > > Are there any things that the GNU >> backend can functionally do that the Studio one can't ? > > There is one case I know of, code coverage, where we invoke the GNU > backend instead of the Studio backend. This is completely transparent > to the user. > >> >> Is there any difference in the CLI flags ? ie are there any flags that >> would be passed to the GNU backend that would cause the Studio backend >> to fail in error (rather than silently ignore) ? > > No. > >> >> Basically are they 100% compatible in there interfaces > > Yes. Any deviations are treated as bugs.
That is answer I was looking for. Given that I'm happy with the Studio backend being the default rather than the GNU one. -- Darren J Moffat
