Che Kristo wrote:
Communities are more of a collection of people with similar interests. A
project is a collection of activities with a beginning and an end which
is what I think best describes what we are discussing here. The
"use-case project" would then feed into many communities (desktop,
security, sys admin, etc).
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Steven Acres <ad...@swatteksystems.com
<mailto:ad...@swatteksystems.com>> wrote:
Peter Tribble wrote:
Jim,
[changed facilitation-discuss to @opensolaris.org
<http://opensolaris.org>, not @sun.com <http://sun.com>]
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Jim Walker<james.wal...@sun.com
<mailto:james.wal...@sun.com>> wrote:
o Project: OpenSolaris Use Case Project
...
Example areas of interest can include:
Systems administration seems conspicuous by its absence!
o Project Members:
Need 5 or more initial members, they will become Core
Contributors.
o Facilitator:
Need 1 facilitator.
Nit: Core contributors and Facilitators apply to communities,
not projects,
so that wouldn't apply.
Would this proposal fit better as a community?
--
Cheers,
Steven Acres
Toronto OpenSolaris User Group <TOROSUG>
Leader http://opensolaris.org/os/project/torosug
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-disc...@opensolaris.org <mailto:indiana-disc...@opensolaris.org>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
That's a good definition of the two Che. The proposal and the future
working of it's implementation seems worded more towards a 'community',
with a set of 'projects' i.e. sysadmin-usecase, desktop-usecase, etc.,
as I understand it, which is why I asked.
--
Cheers,
Steven Acres
Toronto OpenSolaris User Group <TOROSUG>
Leader http://opensolaris.org/os/project/torosug
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
