On 07/19/10 12:05, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shawn Walker<shawn.wal...@oracle.com>  wrote:

On 07/19/10 02:50 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
...
If we add the inverted tsort algorith and a default prefix for packages
(e.g. http://schily.net/packages) and if we combine this with ZFS,
is there really something missing?

For those interested in learning more about the dependency solver use by
pkg(5) (integrated in build 128), read more here:

    http://blogs.sun.com/barts/entry/satisfaction

You don't seem to know that SchilliX has no problems to resolve dependencies
using tsort since several years.

tsort works for linker dependencies since 30 years the only difference is that
the output has to be reversed for packages.

Jörg


This would assume that dependencies do not contain version information,
there are no incorporations, optional or exclude dependencies, and
there are no cycles in the dependency graph.

- Bart




--
Bart Smaalders                  Solaris Kernel Performance
bart.smaald...@oracle.com       http://blogs.sun.com/barts
"You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird."
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to