Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> Matthias Loepfe wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I just realized that SSLeay-0.9.0 and OpenSSL-0.9.2 are not binary compatible
> > at all (I'm using shared libs). It seems that at least some structures have
> > changed in a incompatible way.
> >
> > What is the policy (if there is one at all) for the future regarding binary
> > compatibility?
>
> Because SSLeay uses so many macros that directly access structures,
> maintaing binary compatibility is rather tricky. It may be that it is
> worth working towards a position where compatibility is possible, but I
> don't think we are there at the moment.
I absolutely agree, but I think we should realy haeding towards a position
where compatibility is possible. Probably this work could be combined with a
future C++ binding. What do you think?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
>
> "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
> who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
> first group; there was less competition there."
> - Indira Gandhi
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthias Loepfe, AdNovum Informatik AG, Roentgenstr. 22, CH-8005 Zurich
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: +41 1 272 6111 Fax: +41 1 272 6312
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
