I use it stand alone as well as the integrated version in Alien
Vault/OSSIM.  It works well enough for a 7500 employee company.

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Brandon Perry
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Not broken for me either. In fact, I have been using openvas for years
> now and it has been absolutely great (although I admit I use it
> conjunction with other tools). I think openvas is a shining example of
> how well an open source tool can be maintained. Kudos to the developers.
>
> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 21:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> this crap does not work since 8 months
>> it was intented to do one scan per month
>>
>> well, it did exactly 3 scans with a HUGE false-positive
>> 2 of the 3 - i can not imagine less help at all
>>
>> and yes i tried the appliance which was a stripped down
>> SuSE wiithout zypper and did not work at all becuse it
>> scanned exactly 3 seconds per host, it did not remeber
>> password changes - it was unusable and needed a week
>> to get it run the first time
>>
>> sorry - but quality does not look like that
>>
>> Am 31.10.2012 21:34, schrieb Scott Damron:
>> > Wow!  That was pretty venomous.  I bet you get lots of help now.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]> 
>> > wrote:
>> >> nice - but the base of CentOS is stoneold
>> >> it is based on Fedora12/13
>> >> until Fedora 15 openvas worked
>> >> now we have fedora 17 and soon F18
>> >>
>> >> since HUNDRETS of packages are working well with
>> >> the gnutls of recent distributions and only openVAS
>> >> does onot run since nearly a year it is pretty clear
>> >> that openVAS is HORRIBLE broken
>> >>
>> >> WHY in the world was the switch to gnutls done instead
>> >> use openssl which works since decades relieable?
>> >>
>> >> yes it is open source
>> >> but my whole environment is based on opensource and
>> >> only openVAS is simply not useable and for sure not
>> >> a valid reason to make the rest of the infrastructure
>> >> quetsionsable which works since Fedora 9, was upgraded
>> >> ONLINE to F17 with YUM (which means online)
>> >>
>> >> well, i speak here about some hundret of domains
>> >> and a hughe count of different services which works
>> >> 100% perfect over years and the WebUI of a security
>> >> scanner is fucking too stupid to connect with it's
>> >> backends which does not require ot be foolishly encrypted
>> >> on lcoal host at all
>> >>
>> >> finally only a lot of wasted hours to get this crap running
>> >> in 2011-12 too see it dying after THREE secscans - a joke
>> >>
>> >> Am 31.10.2012 21:21, schrieb Schulte:
>> >>> with CentOS 6.3 it works.
>> >>>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: Openvas-discuss
>> >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext
>> >>> Eero Volotinen
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 19:33
>> >>> To: Reindl Harald
>> >>> Cc: [email protected]
>> >>> Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] openvas gnutls bug again?
>> >>>
>> >>> 2012/10/31 Reindl Harald <[email protected]>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Am 31.10.2012 17:02, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
>> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Tried to install openvas on latest debian and still seeing this
>> >>> gnutls
>> >>>>> bug:
>> >>> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-devel/2012-July/00295
>> >>> 1.html
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> how to fix this issue? (without compling openvas from sources?)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> i was NEVER able to get GSA working past Fedora 15
>> >>>> gnutls-2.12.17-1.fc17.x86_64
>> >>>
>> >>> sad :( so fix for openvas 5 is only in svn trunk? is there any distro
>> >>> that works out of box with openvas 5?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openvas-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openvas-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

Reply via email to