how do you get "Greenbone Security Assistent" work to login? this worked with F15 but not after upgrade to F16/F17
the services are starting, but no login pssoible fedora does not provide GSA at all as package i rebuilt ALL openvas packlages by myself i switched all of them to native systemd-units after F16 GSA was broken and never worked until now and NO i have no use for a terminal in this context i need a GRAPHICAL overview to use my time for daily business my primary job is software-development / administration my servers are well setup proven by penetration tests with nessus from outide and a lot of targeted attacks with o effect and i have simply no time to waste it with ONE application - i wasted a complete week to build my own vmware-appliance which is broken since months Am 31.10.2012 22:13, schrieb Brandon Perry: > Wrong, I run it on fedora 17 exclusively atm. The installation guide on > the openvas website is great. All you need is one command after yum. > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:11 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> it does NOT run on a recent fedora >> it does NOT run in F16/F17 >> >> and as long ANY infrastructure >> >> * http/php >> * epp (domain regsitart interfaces) >> * dns >> * dhcp >> * voip >> * fax >> * openvpn >> * databases >> * trafficserver >> * afp/smb >> * smtp >> * pop3 >> * imap >> * sieve >> * routing >> * network-gateways >> >> with all sorts of backend-applications and interfaces are working >> fine over years over EIGHT major dist-upgrades without any problem >> i know what has to be considered as broken if only one sofwtare >> fails to work >> >> 7500 employee company sounds nice but means usually "we setup >> systems with 10 years support and never touch anything" - this >> does not work in every industry and if you have a perfect working >> build/deployment system for one distribution you will not >> mix distributions because one package >> >> Am 31.10.2012 22:00, schrieb Scott Damron: >>> I use it stand alone as well as the integrated version in Alien >>> Vault/OSSIM. It works well enough for a 7500 employee company. >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Brandon Perry >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Not broken for me either. In fact, I have been using openvas for years >>>> now and it has been absolutely great (although I admit I use it >>>> conjunction with other tools). I think openvas is a shining example of >>>> how well an open source tool can be maintained. Kudos to the developers. >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 21:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> this crap does not work since 8 months >>>>> it was intented to do one scan per month >>>>> >>>>> well, it did exactly 3 scans with a HUGE false-positive >>>>> 2 of the 3 - i can not imagine less help at all >>>>> >>>>> and yes i tried the appliance which was a stripped down >>>>> SuSE wiithout zypper and did not work at all becuse it >>>>> scanned exactly 3 seconds per host, it did not remeber >>>>> password changes - it was unusable and needed a week >>>>> to get it run the first time >>>>> >>>>> sorry - but quality does not look like that >>>>> >>>>> Am 31.10.2012 21:34, schrieb Scott Damron: >>>>>> Wow! That was pretty venomous. I bet you get lots of help now. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> nice - but the base of CentOS is stoneold >>>>>>> it is based on Fedora12/13 >>>>>>> until Fedora 15 openvas worked >>>>>>> now we have fedora 17 and soon F18 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> since HUNDRETS of packages are working well with >>>>>>> the gnutls of recent distributions and only openVAS >>>>>>> does onot run since nearly a year it is pretty clear >>>>>>> that openVAS is HORRIBLE broken >>>>>>> >>>>>>> WHY in the world was the switch to gnutls done instead >>>>>>> use openssl which works since decades relieable? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> yes it is open source >>>>>>> but my whole environment is based on opensource and >>>>>>> only openVAS is simply not useable and for sure not >>>>>>> a valid reason to make the rest of the infrastructure >>>>>>> quetsionsable which works since Fedora 9, was upgraded >>>>>>> ONLINE to F17 with YUM (which means online) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> well, i speak here about some hundret of domains >>>>>>> and a hughe count of different services which works >>>>>>> 100% perfect over years and the WebUI of a security >>>>>>> scanner is fucking too stupid to connect with it's >>>>>>> backends which does not require ot be foolishly encrypted >>>>>>> on lcoal host at all >>>>>>> >>>>>>> finally only a lot of wasted hours to get this crap running >>>>>>> in 2011-12 too see it dying after THREE secscans - a joke >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 31.10.2012 21:21, schrieb Schulte: >>>>>>>> with CentOS 6.3 it works. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Openvas-discuss >>>>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext >>>>>>>> Eero Volotinen >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 19:33 >>>>>>>> To: Reindl Harald >>>>>>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] openvas gnutls bug again? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2012/10/31 Reindl Harald <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am 31.10.2012 17:02, schrieb Eero Volotinen: >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tried to install openvas on latest debian and still seeing this >>>>>>>> gnutls >>>>>>>>>> bug: >>>>>>>> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-devel/2012-July/00295 >>>>>>>> 1.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> how to fix this issue? (without compling openvas from sources?) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> i was NEVER able to get GSA working past Fedora 15 >>>>>>>>> gnutls-2.12.17-1.fc17.x86_64 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sad :( so fix for openvas 5 is only in svn trunk? is there any distro >>>>>>>> that works out of box with openvas 5? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openvas-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
