I do not use gsa or gsd, I use multiple products and aggregate the data and only require programmatic access.
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > how do you get "Greenbone Security Assistent" work to > login? this worked with F15 but not after upgrade to F16/F17 > > the services are starting, but no login pssoible > > fedora does not provide GSA at all as package > i rebuilt ALL openvas packlages by myself > i switched all of them to native systemd-units > after F16 GSA was broken and never worked until now > > and NO i have no use for a terminal in this context > i need a GRAPHICAL overview to use my time for daily business > > my primary job is software-development / administration > my servers are well setup proven by penetration tests > with nessus from outide and a lot of targeted attacks > with o effect and i have simply no time to waste it > with ONE application - i wasted a complete week > to build my own vmware-appliance which is broken > since months > > Am 31.10.2012 22:13, schrieb Brandon Perry: > > Wrong, I run it on fedora 17 exclusively atm. The installation guide on > > the openvas website is great. All you need is one command after yum. > > > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:11 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> it does NOT run on a recent fedora > >> it does NOT run in F16/F17 > >> > >> and as long ANY infrastructure > >> > >> * http/php > >> * epp (domain regsitart interfaces) > >> * dns > >> * dhcp > >> * voip > >> * fax > >> * openvpn > >> * databases > >> * trafficserver > >> * afp/smb > >> * smtp > >> * pop3 > >> * imap > >> * sieve > >> * routing > >> * network-gateways > >> > >> with all sorts of backend-applications and interfaces are working > >> fine over years over EIGHT major dist-upgrades without any problem > >> i know what has to be considered as broken if only one sofwtare > >> fails to work > >> > >> 7500 employee company sounds nice but means usually "we setup > >> systems with 10 years support and never touch anything" - this > >> does not work in every industry and if you have a perfect working > >> build/deployment system for one distribution you will not > >> mix distributions because one package > >> > >> Am 31.10.2012 22:00, schrieb Scott Damron: > >>> I use it stand alone as well as the integrated version in Alien > >>> Vault/OSSIM. It works well enough for a 7500 employee company. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Brandon Perry > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Not broken for me either. In fact, I have been using openvas for years > >>>> now and it has been absolutely great (although I admit I use it > >>>> conjunction with other tools). I think openvas is a shining example of > >>>> how well an open source tool can be maintained. Kudos to the developers. > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 21:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > >>>>> this crap does not work since 8 months > >>>>> it was intented to do one scan per month > >>>>> > >>>>> well, it did exactly 3 scans with a HUGE false-positive > >>>>> 2 of the 3 - i can not imagine less help at all > >>>>> > >>>>> and yes i tried the appliance which was a stripped down > >>>>> SuSE wiithout zypper and did not work at all becuse it > >>>>> scanned exactly 3 seconds per host, it did not remeber > >>>>> password changes - it was unusable and needed a week > >>>>> to get it run the first time > >>>>> > >>>>> sorry - but quality does not look like that > >>>>> > >>>>> Am 31.10.2012 21:34, schrieb Scott Damron: > >>>>>> Wow! That was pretty venomous. I bet you get lots of help now. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Reindl Harald > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> nice - but the base of CentOS is stoneold > >>>>>>> it is based on Fedora12/13 > >>>>>>> until Fedora 15 openvas worked > >>>>>>> now we have fedora 17 and soon F18 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> since HUNDRETS of packages are working well with > >>>>>>> the gnutls of recent distributions and only openVAS > >>>>>>> does onot run since nearly a year it is pretty clear > >>>>>>> that openVAS is HORRIBLE broken > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> WHY in the world was the switch to gnutls done instead > >>>>>>> use openssl which works since decades relieable? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> yes it is open source > >>>>>>> but my whole environment is based on opensource and > >>>>>>> only openVAS is simply not useable and for sure not > >>>>>>> a valid reason to make the rest of the infrastructure > >>>>>>> quetsionsable which works since Fedora 9, was upgraded > >>>>>>> ONLINE to F17 with YUM (which means online) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> well, i speak here about some hundret of domains > >>>>>>> and a hughe count of different services which works > >>>>>>> 100% perfect over years and the WebUI of a security > >>>>>>> scanner is fucking too stupid to connect with it's > >>>>>>> backends which does not require ot be foolishly encrypted > >>>>>>> on lcoal host at all > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> finally only a lot of wasted hours to get this crap running > >>>>>>> in 2011-12 too see it dying after THREE secscans - a joke > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Am 31.10.2012 21:21, schrieb Schulte: > >>>>>>>> with CentOS 6.3 it works. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>> From: Openvas-discuss > >>>>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext > >>>>>>>> Eero Volotinen > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 19:33 > >>>>>>>> To: Reindl Harald > >>>>>>>> Cc: [email protected] > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] openvas gnutls bug again? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2012/10/31 Reindl Harald <[email protected]>: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Am 31.10.2012 17:02, schrieb Eero Volotinen: > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Tried to install openvas on latest debian and still seeing this > >>>>>>>> gnutls > >>>>>>>>>> bug: > >>>>>>>> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-devel/2012-July/00295 > >>>>>>>> 1.html > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> how to fix this issue? (without compling openvas from sources?) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> i was NEVER able to get GSA working past Fedora 15 > >>>>>>>>> gnutls-2.12.17-1.fc17.x86_64 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> sad :( so fix for openvas 5 is only in svn trunk? is there any distro > >>>>>>>> that works out of box with openvas 5? > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Openvas-discuss mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Openvas-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss _______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
