well, and THIS is the difference GSA uses libmicrohttpd and gnutls this doe sno longer work this worked until upgrade to F16 this was never fixed until now
not for OpenVAS4.x and upgrade to OpenVAs 5.x did not solve tjis at all Am 31.10.2012 22:24, schrieb Brandon Perry: > I do not use gsa or gsd, I use multiple products and aggregate the data > and only require programmatic access. > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> how do you get "Greenbone Security Assistent" work to >> login? this worked with F15 but not after upgrade to F16/F17 >> >> the services are starting, but no login pssoible >> >> fedora does not provide GSA at all as package >> i rebuilt ALL openvas packlages by myself >> i switched all of them to native systemd-units >> after F16 GSA was broken and never worked until now >> >> and NO i have no use for a terminal in this context >> i need a GRAPHICAL overview to use my time for daily business >> >> my primary job is software-development / administration >> my servers are well setup proven by penetration tests >> with nessus from outide and a lot of targeted attacks >> with o effect and i have simply no time to waste it >> with ONE application - i wasted a complete week >> to build my own vmware-appliance which is broken >> since months >> >> Am 31.10.2012 22:13, schrieb Brandon Perry: >>> Wrong, I run it on fedora 17 exclusively atm. The installation guide on >>> the openvas website is great. All you need is one command after yum. >>> >>> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:11 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> it does NOT run on a recent fedora >>>> it does NOT run in F16/F17 >>>> >>>> and as long ANY infrastructure >>>> >>>> * http/php >>>> * epp (domain regsitart interfaces) >>>> * dns >>>> * dhcp >>>> * voip >>>> * fax >>>> * openvpn >>>> * databases >>>> * trafficserver >>>> * afp/smb >>>> * smtp >>>> * pop3 >>>> * imap >>>> * sieve >>>> * routing >>>> * network-gateways >>>> >>>> with all sorts of backend-applications and interfaces are working >>>> fine over years over EIGHT major dist-upgrades without any problem >>>> i know what has to be considered as broken if only one sofwtare >>>> fails to work >>>> >>>> 7500 employee company sounds nice but means usually "we setup >>>> systems with 10 years support and never touch anything" - this >>>> does not work in every industry and if you have a perfect working >>>> build/deployment system for one distribution you will not >>>> mix distributions because one package >>>> >>>> Am 31.10.2012 22:00, schrieb Scott Damron: >>>>> I use it stand alone as well as the integrated version in Alien >>>>> Vault/OSSIM. It works well enough for a 7500 employee company. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Brandon Perry >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Not broken for me either. In fact, I have been using openvas for years >>>>>> now and it has been absolutely great (although I admit I use it >>>>>> conjunction with other tools). I think openvas is a shining example of >>>>>> how well an open source tool can be maintained. Kudos to the developers. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 21:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>>>> this crap does not work since 8 months >>>>>>> it was intented to do one scan per month >>>>>>> >>>>>>> well, it did exactly 3 scans with a HUGE false-positive >>>>>>> 2 of the 3 - i can not imagine less help at all >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and yes i tried the appliance which was a stripped down >>>>>>> SuSE wiithout zypper and did not work at all becuse it >>>>>>> scanned exactly 3 seconds per host, it did not remeber >>>>>>> password changes - it was unusable and needed a week >>>>>>> to get it run the first time >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sorry - but quality does not look like that >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 31.10.2012 21:34, schrieb Scott Damron: >>>>>>>> Wow! That was pretty venomous. I bet you get lots of help now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Reindl Harald >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> nice - but the base of CentOS is stoneold >>>>>>>>> it is based on Fedora12/13 >>>>>>>>> until Fedora 15 openvas worked >>>>>>>>> now we have fedora 17 and soon F18 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> since HUNDRETS of packages are working well with >>>>>>>>> the gnutls of recent distributions and only openVAS >>>>>>>>> does onot run since nearly a year it is pretty clear >>>>>>>>> that openVAS is HORRIBLE broken >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> WHY in the world was the switch to gnutls done instead >>>>>>>>> use openssl which works since decades relieable? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> yes it is open source >>>>>>>>> but my whole environment is based on opensource and >>>>>>>>> only openVAS is simply not useable and for sure not >>>>>>>>> a valid reason to make the rest of the infrastructure >>>>>>>>> quetsionsable which works since Fedora 9, was upgraded >>>>>>>>> ONLINE to F17 with YUM (which means online) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> well, i speak here about some hundret of domains >>>>>>>>> and a hughe count of different services which works >>>>>>>>> 100% perfect over years and the WebUI of a security >>>>>>>>> scanner is fucking too stupid to connect with it's >>>>>>>>> backends which does not require ot be foolishly encrypted >>>>>>>>> on lcoal host at all >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> finally only a lot of wasted hours to get this crap running >>>>>>>>> in 2011-12 too see it dying after THREE secscans - a joke >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am 31.10.2012 21:21, schrieb Schulte: >>>>>>>>>> with CentOS 6.3 it works. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>> From: Openvas-discuss >>>>>>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext >>>>>>>>>> Eero Volotinen >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 19:33 >>>>>>>>>> To: Reindl Harald >>>>>>>>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] openvas gnutls bug again? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2012/10/31 Reindl Harald <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 31.10.2012 17:02, schrieb Eero Volotinen: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tried to install openvas on latest debian and still seeing this >>>>>>>>>> gnutls >>>>>>>>>>>> bug: >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-devel/2012-July/00295 >>>>>>>>>> 1.html >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> how to fix this issue? (without compling openvas from sources?) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> i was NEVER able to get GSA working past Fedora 15 >>>>>>>>>>> gnutls-2.12.17-1.fc17.x86_64 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> sad :( so fix for openvas 5 is only in svn trunk? is there any distro >>>>>>>>>> that works out of box with openvas 5?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
