ACK. What we had was too strict in some cases, breaking people's
configs - with this change, we give users enough rope to hang themselves
if they insist to do so, but point out in the log file that this might
be a stupid idea...
(That this came up in the first place is a consequence of commit
86e2fa5597fd1ad8e, 2.3 "supported" this mode of operation "fine")
Tested on linux - and it does the right motions. Whether or not
"route6 without ifconfig6" does the right thing on platform <x>
is not something we guarantee or promise :-)
Your patch has been applied to the master and release/2.4 branch.
commit 2b7650e7ec9241745e4f66c932d6cffaece927d7 (master)
commit c74d574417b8b491fe6ad44e89843af8479cc9be (release/2.4)
Author: Antonio Quartulli
Date: Tue Jan 31 19:21:31 2017 +0800
attempt to add IPv6 route even when no IPv6 address was configured
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Gert Doering <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
URL:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13994.html
Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <[email protected]>
--
kind regards,
Gert Doering
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
