you will have to change the DOCTYPE in ejb-jar.xml file to point to ejb2 dtd.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Drury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 2:21 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: support EJB2.0 or not?



My guess is the Orion is assuming my EJB is a 1.1 entity
bean.  What tell Orion that the bean is a 2.0 bean?
Perhaps that is where my mistake lies.

-tim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: John D'Ausilio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 3:28 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: support EJB2.0 or not?
> 
> 
> You need to examine your deployment descriptor and 
> class/interface defs ..
> there are lots of rules to follow, and they're easy to miss. 
> I have CMP
> beans and dependent objects in various types of relationships 
> all running
> just fine, but I've spent many an hour trying to find 
> mistakes evidenced by
> errors such as yours. Go through the contract in section 9 of 
> the spec, and
> assume nothing  :)
> 
> (I wish I could remember just which mistake it was that 
> caused that problem,
> but I cant)
> 
> jd
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Drury
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 12:18 PM
> > To: Orion-Interest
> > Subject: support EJB2.0 or not?
> >
> >
> >
> > When I try to write a 2.0 compliant entity bean:
> >
> > public abstract class ContactBean implement EntityBean
> > {
> >    public abstract void setName(String s);
> >    public abstract String getName();
> >    ...
> >
> > }
> >
> > Orion throws the error (at deployment):
> >
> > ... Bean class com.tfc.ejb.ContactBean must not be declared
> > abstract
> >
> > So what did I do wrong?  Does Orion 1.3.8 or 1.4.0 support
> > EJB 2.0 entity beans like the web page advertises or not?
> >
> > -tim
> 
> 

Reply via email to