Could someone please post some tips on how to replace Orion's JMS with another
one? I wouldn't event know where to start!
Although, I have successfully used publish/subscribe on Orion's JMS I'm having
problems getting an auto-started client application to receive messages. I
would like to try another JMS implementation.
Thanks,
Vidur
Mike Sick wrote:
> Just a follow up. I noticed that Fiorano is making a JMS test suite
> available in case anyone wants to get it and run it against Orion. If you
> do - let us know how it goes.
>
> http://www.fiorano.com/products/jms.htm
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Rimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 10:42 PM
> Subject: JMS implementation, is it for real?
>
> > Is Orion's JMS implementation for real? While it supports the
> > simplistic behavior as demonstrated by the chat and coffeemaker demo it
> > doesn't appear to support much else.
> > JMS parts I can't get working:
> > o Transactions. Doesn't seem to matter what you call: commit,
> rollback,
> > etc. Doesn't make a difference.
> > o Persistence: Make the change in the jms.xml to define a queue's
> > persistent-file, set the message delivery mode to persistent, watch it get
> > ignored.
> >
> > Has anyone had much luck with this? Perhaps SwiftMQ is the answer
> here
> > (even though I want to use the MessageDrivenBeans).
> >
> > --
> > Jason Rimmer
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
