Since I'm working with Fiorano now I'll take the charge to get a hold of
this test suite and report back results of it's use against Orion. Thanks
for bringing this to my attention, Mike.
--
Jason Rimmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Sick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: JMS implementation, is it for real?
> Just a follow up. I noticed that Fiorano is making a JMS test suite
> available in case anyone wants to get it and run it against Orion. If you
> do - let us know how it goes.
>
> http://www.fiorano.com/products/jms.htm
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Rimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 10:42 PM
> Subject: JMS implementation, is it for real?
>
>
> > Is Orion's JMS implementation for real? While it supports the
> > simplistic behavior as demonstrated by the chat and coffeemaker demo it
> > doesn't appear to support much else.
> > JMS parts I can't get working:
> > o Transactions. Doesn't seem to matter what you call: commit,
> rollback,
> > etc. Doesn't make a difference.
> > o Persistence: Make the change in the jms.xml to define a queue's
> > persistent-file, set the message delivery mode to persistent, watch it
get
> > ignored.
> >
> > Has anyone had much luck with this? Perhaps SwiftMQ is the answer
> here
> > (even though I want to use the MessageDrivenBeans).
> >
> > --
> > Jason Rimmer
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
