Have you tried SonicMQ with Orion? SonicMQ seems quite compliant but I have
not tried integrating it with Orion - is it possible? easy?
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Rimmer
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 10:14 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Initial JMSTest++ results, sort of
>
>
> JMSTest++ is a JMS v1.0.2 compliance test suite written by Fiorano
> (http://www.fiorano.com) which publishes a competing JMS
> implementation. I
> performed the compliance tests on a machine with the following
> specifications:
> o Dell Intel Pentium 3 - 600 Mhz with 128Mb memory
> o Windows 200 SP1
> o Orion v1.4.0
> o Javasoft's JDK v1.3 (running in mixed mode)
>
> The compliance suite consists of ~800 tests which includes the breadth
> of functionality detailed in the JMS v1.0.2 specification..
> There is a caveat in that Orion's JMS implementation is only
> claimed to
> be JMS v1.0 compliant while the JMSTest++ tests are to determine
> JMS v1.0.2
> compliance. This isn't a large issue as the difference between the spec's
> are small and therefore only cover a small percentage of the tests.
> This message was going to contain details of all the tests, their
> results, and commentary. Unfortunately, Orion's JMS implementation was
> unable to pass anything more than the rudimentary tests. The most common
> test result was a hang, though a functionality failure was right behind.
> I spent some time looking over much of the JMSTest++ source
> and while I
> can't claim every test is 100% legitimate, it largely appears reasonable.
> The test suite is in active internal use at not only Fiorano, but
> also Bea,
> and Progress (home of SonicMQ).
> Considering my results I believe it's false to claim that
> Orion supports
> JMS v1.0, let alone v1.0.2. The bottom line is that I would not depend on
> Orion's JMS implementation for anything: educational tool, toy, or
> production application.
> I don't plan to take up the testing again unless Evermind makes major
> JMS updates or the list membership considers specific results to be
> valuable.
>
> --
> Jason Rimmer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
