You
are probably right in your asumptions. Might I ask why you have chosen to go for
PostgreSQL? To me it seems a bit too uncertain to have two pieces of
experimental software in one project. Personally I was thinking of switching to
either MySQL or Interbase once my system goes on-line. I have used Interbase
quite a lot, just not with EJBs, and it is totally free and open source
nowadays. I have no experience with MySQL, but as far as I have read on this
list, quite many people are fond of it, and it seems that the use of MySQL is a
question of once needs for transactions (which MySQL does not
support).
I am
wondering if anyone is using the prepackaged Hypersonic database in
production... It has not given me any trouble during this development project...
yet... - I would feel MUCH better about using a 10+ years old well-tested
database like Interbase, and I simply do not know why more people are not using
it.
Any
comments anyone?
Randahl
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23. februar 2001 18:39 To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: Win2k Pro. is messing up the DB
|
- Win2k Pro. is messing up the DB orion
- RE: Win2k Pro. is messing up the DB Randahl Fink Isaksen
- Re: Win2k Pro. is messing up the DB orion
- RE: Win2k Pro. is mess... choosing the r... Randahl Fink Isaksen
- RE: Win2k Pro. is mess... choosing t... Tim Endres
- RE: Win2k Pro. is mess... choosing t... Arno Grbac
- Re: Win2k Pro. is mess... choos... Vimal Patel
- RE: Win2k Pro. is mess... c... Arno Grbac
- Re: Win2k Pro. is mess... c... Falk Langhammer
- Interbase and Orion / F... Randahl Fink Isaksen
- RE: Win2k Pro. is mess... choos... Ray Harrison
- RE: Win2k Pro. is mess... c... Christian Billen
- RE: Win2k Pro. is mess... choos... Davina and Mac