Hi Steve,

   Yes, I'd be interested in a Google Group membership, if only to help keep 
using Protel 99SE SP6 which I don't use often but have used for years.

If you get this off the ground then please count me in

Cheers

   Col

Colin R Dillicar
Colmin Associates
Ph +64 9 834 4040
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"AVAST" AV Checked


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Geoff Harland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Open Topic Forum" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 7:18 PM
Subject: [OT] Mailing Lists (was Re: anyone here?)


>> At 2008-02-29 11:27, Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
>> >I think that's what happened to me.  I went to the Techserv list page 
>> >and
>> >saw that somehow I was only subscribed to the OT forum.  That explains 
>> >why
>> >I haven't been getting PEDA messages.  As to why I was dropped, that is 
>> >a
>> >mystery.
>>
>> I think that's happened to me as well. And when I tried to go to
>> techservinc.com, I got a brag page saying that the site has been hacked.
>>
>> Before this whole community just fades away, I'd like to suggest that
>> if there's enough interest we might want to move to a Google group. I
>> run a number of such groups for nonprofit organizations I'm involved
>> in, and they work very well. I just run those as closed groups, not
>> searchable in the directory, because there we have other ways to make
>> contact. I'm thinking I could set up such a group for Protel (just
>> one, please!), primarily focused on the 99SE SP6 that seems to be the
>> pinnacle of its evolution. Those of us who are staying with the tool
>> that works would then not be completely cut off from one another. I'd
>> want to keep it locked so that new memberships would have to be
>> approved (probably with something proving that you're really involved
>> in PCB design), and that non-members couldn't post, but anyone could
>> read, and once subscribed there would be no moderation. If someone
>> abuses it, of course, they'd be unsubscribed. If we do this, I'd like
>> to have a backup moderator, preferably someone who's been around this
>> group a while and who is in a very different time zone (I'm USA
>> Eastern Time, GMT-5) so that one of us would be likely to be on email
>> at any given time.
>>
>> Comments invited!
>>
>> Steve Hendrix
>
> I know it's been a while since Steve sent that message, but for everyone's 
> information, there is already a Yahoo!-based mailing list in existence 
> which caters for users of Protel (and later versions such as DXP and AD).
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protel-users/
>
> It was initially established as a backup mailing list for the [PEDA] 
> mailing list,but I still think that it would be preferable to use that 
> mailing list, rather then setting up yet another Yahoo!-based mailing 
> list.
>
> While it is currently of an "open" nature as far as membership is 
> concerned, I would not have any objections to restrictions being imposed 
> upon membership from now on, if for no other reason then to purge 
> spammers. (There has been some spam on that list in the past, though it 
> has not been a significant problem in recent times.)
>
> Regards,
> Geoff Harland.
>
>
>      Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address.
> www.yahoo7.com.au/y7mail
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the OT discussion forum
>
> To Post messages:
> mailto:[email protected]
>
> Unsubscribe and Other Options:
> http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/ot_techservinc.com
>
> Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] 


____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the OT discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/ot_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to