I agree. On a Mac OS 9 or earlier system I tend to think that unless you have specific applications that are set to use large amounts 512MB or more is pretty worthless. On Mac OS X though I find this to be entirely the opposite situation. 512MB or more seems like a comfortable amount for Mac OS X to do about anything but more always generates a benefit regardless of the amount.
David On Sunday, January 5, 2003, at 01:24 PM, Robert Gray wrote: > At 02:21:31 -0500 on 01/05/03, Philip Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Memory is kinda like money; you can have too little RAM. >> You can't have too much. > > Wrong. If you don't use it, you have too much. > Any good socialist knows that! ;-) -- PCI-PowerMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- Sonnet & PowerLogix Upgrades - start at $169 | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> PCI-PowerMacs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/pci-powermacs.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/pci-powermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
