So I agree this is good: -lib lua [import lua]
Then it seems that it would be nice if the projects were either: pdlua pdtcl pdhaskell or: luapd tclpd haskellpd How about the first one? .hc On Mar 13, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote: > Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> XXX >> --- >> lua.pd_linux > > ^^ this is what I use. The project as a whole is called 'pdlua' > but the external for Pd is called 'lua', like '-lib lua' and [lua]. > >> tcl.pd_linux >> haskell.pd_linux > > ^^ this is probably what I will use if I ever resume work on my > Haskell external, or maybe 'ghc.pd_linux' if it depends on that > Haskell implementation. > > The extra 'pd' in the other alternative are redundant. > >> Any perferred name? I don't think I have a strong preference of >> any name, but I do think there should be a simple, standard >> naming scheme. > > Remove redundant 'pd's. > > > Claude ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Access to computers should be unlimited and total. - the hacker ethic _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev