Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On May 25, 2008, at 5:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Quoting Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >>> i think the [r pd][route dsp] approach is a kludge... > >> > >> Maybe this: > >> > >> [dsp( > >> | > >> [s pd] > >> > >> > >> [r pd] > >> | > >> [route dsp] > > > > > > exactly this is the kind of "kludge" i am talking about. i hope > > that "kludge" means something really bad and ugly, as this is how i > > use this word here. > > You mean it's a kludge if there isn't a special object for this?
The real problem is that it's global: I may not want all my [r pd] receivers to get activated every time something somewhere queries the state of DSP. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev