Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Jun 29, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote: > >A fairly standard way to deal with bugs fixes is to include them in > >"trunk". I don't think, one can expect users to follow every branch. > >In fact, I don't check out the branches at all, because there are so > >many of them and I don't want to search every branch for a bug fix. > > They will be included in trunk. We would never get anything done if > we had to maintain trunk in a releasable state. > > Come on, please don't give me a hard time about trunk not being > perfectly working. I have enough to do with getting a good release out.
I didn't want to give you a hard time, sorry if I sounded like that. It's a minor bug and can be fixed in the trunk in whatever time you prefer. Though there is a larger question lurking here: What should trunk be and how should bug reporters check, if a bug may be already fixed? Or in short: What is the reference repository: some branches or the trunk? To me, trunk was that reference version (and for the record: to me it is for bug reports regarding my stuff, unless the reports are branch-specific). But if you regard pd-extended branches as reference for your externals, I'll take note of that for future reports. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
