It’s hard to read the intentions behind text without knowing the person. I’ve met a good number of people on this list but not everyone.
I think the point of my last mail was more: “we started having a discussion about moving extended/ the extended externals forward in a community manner and, as it seems to me, we keep digressing into PD-L2ork”. It’s good to hear the technical things you have learned with the project that might help this effort out, but we don’t really need other details at this time. -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> > On Dec 23, 2014, at 3:16 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > From: Ivica Bukvic <i...@vt.edu <mailto:i...@vt.edu>> > Cc: "pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>" <pd-l...@mail.iem.at > <mailto:pd-l...@mail.iem.at>> > To: Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com <mailto:danomat...@gmail.com>> > Date: December 23, 2014 at 3:16:12 AM EST > Subject: Re: [PD] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Extending Vanilla (was Cyclone help > patches & issue list) > > > > On Dec 23, 2014 1:53 AM, "Dan Wilcox" <danomat...@gmail.com > <mailto:danomat...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > You know guys, all I’m saying is perhaps there’s a way to move forward with > > the spirit of Pd-extended with the practicality of making it easy to use > > the extended externals with vanilla. In no way was I trying to say what > > you’re doing or not doing with pd-l2ork is wrong. > > > > This line "I assume l2ork doesn’t rely on one person testing and building > > across multiple platforms?” is only asking if you’ve experienced what a > > pain it is to handle that. It takes work and it’s *really* nice not to have > > to rely on one or two people to manually check things. I wrote that in > > comradeship assuming you agree that it’s a pain to do. > > > > I appreciate the work y’all are doing, but not everyone wants to use > > pd-l2ork and you yourselves have said you have no interest in trying to > > fill the role of Pd-extended. > > I think you may have misunderstood me (or I may have misspoke, honestly can't > remember). Pd-l2ork is and has since its inception replaced extended in my > own work. Out of respect to the work of Hans and many others have done with > extended, as well as pd-l2ork's arguably lesser concern with legacy stuff I > never wanted to claim it will do the same for you and others (even though as > of right now I can think of a couple, mainly cosmetic reasons why it > wouldn't). > > Best, > > Ico >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
